CFTC War Heats Up in New York, Triggers Emergency Powers

Written By Jon Young | Published at August 12, 2026
Kalshi logo trending prediction markets
Kalshi logo prediction markets - REUTERS

The seemingly endless war between prediction markets enforcer, the CFTC, and New York continued this week. The Commodity Futures Trading Commission has invoked what it calls “emergency powers” to ensure Kalshi continues operating in the Empire State.  

Kalshi is one of the largest of the prediction markets in the U.S. However, its resolve – and that of the CFTC – is being tested with multiple state interventions.

The CFTC has now stepped in by exercising emergency authority “to ensure market stability”.

Concrete Jungle Where Prediction Dreams Are Made Of

In a press release, the CFTC said it was ordering Kalshi to continue operating “in accordance with the Commodity Exchange Act’s Core Principles.”

New York attorney-general, Letitia James, filed a complaint against Kalshi at the end of July. In addition to a complete cessation of operations, Kalshi was also ordered to pay $36 billion.

However, the CFTC argued that prediction markets like Kalshi must abide by the Commodity Exchange Act, not individual state rules.

“New York intends to make event contract derivatives waste away under its iron curtain of state gaming laws before the courts get the chance to issue final rulings,” said CFTC chairman, Michael S. Selig.

“Congress did not intend for derivatives exchanges to be regulated under a patchwork of state gaming laws. These are financial exchanges that offer financial instruments and operate across state lines.

Prediction Markets vs Sportsbooks: The Battle Rages

The war on prediction markets shows no sign of abating in states such as New York. The key argument surrounds the difference between online sportsbooks (which are legal in NY) and prediction markets.

Kalshi is regulated on a federal level and is therefore out of the grasps of state gaming regulators. They and the CFTC argue that the markets it and other sites offer should be classed as share-trading platforms.

States like New York counter that when offering trades on sports, they become no different from online sportsbooks and should be licensed as such.

Increasingly, Kalshi and Polymarket have offered “event contracts” for sale on 1000s of markets covering NFL, soccer, and more. On the recent FIFA World Cup alone, Kalshi say over $1 billion in trades on the outright winner.

Just a few years ago, Kalshi was valued at a fraction of what it’s worth now. Following a recent cash injection, the prediction market is valued at around $22 billion. The future is certainly in prediction markets that are transparent and where odds are governed by traders, not a centralized bookmaker.

However, with multiple states executing legal challenges, or planning to, the ultimate decision on Kalshi et al may rest with the Supreme Court. Intense debates on which jurisdiction prediction markets lie could end up in the highest court as states battle for control.