Los Angeles Rams @ Seattle Seahawks Prediction, Odds & Picks – January 25, 2026
Los Angeles Rams (12-5-0) come in; Seattle Seahawks (14-3-0) sit on the other side of the matchup. Those records set the baseline. The real separator is in the component: quarterback efficiency, rushing workload, and target distribution that show where the advantage actually sits. Kickoff is Sunday, January 25, 2026 at 6:30 PM.
This breakdown is built around a simple idea: set the game with the spread (Seahawks -2.5) and recent form, then confirm that set against how these offenses and defenses usually perform. That comparison is where useful betting angles tend to appear.
FOX carries this matchup from Lumen Field.

Rams @ Seahawks: Season records, ATS, and O/U snapshot
Comparison indicates the gaps. This overview shows season results (W-L-T), last five momentum, and betting analytics side by side, giving you the full picture. All rows below reflect season-to-date performance. Market: Seahawks -2.5 (total not posted yet). ATS is market performance; O/U is scoring shape.
| Away Team Rams (LA) | Home Team Seahawks (SEA) | |
|---|---|---|
| Season Record | 12-5-0 | 14-3-0 |
| Last 5 Record | 3-2 | 5-0 |
| Season ATS | 12-5 | 12-5 |
| Season O/U | 10-7 | 9-8 |
| Spread | +2.5 | -2.5 |
Rams vs Seahawks Recent Result and Market Outcomes
This short view shows last-game inputs as they are included in the response. It stays consistent and does not guess ATS or O/U direction.
This section keeps a strict review that is entirely driven by returned labels. If one side is missing a field, it does not declare an advantage.
| Team | Last Result | ATS (Last Game) | O/U (Last Game) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rams | Win | Covered | Over |
| Seahawks | Win | Covered | Under |
Rams @ Seahawks Game Lines: Quick Market Story
This is not a full board for Rams @ Seahawks. Use the available line as context, then confirm with matchup evidence. Line check: Seahawks -2.5 on the spread; moneyline Rams +118, Seahawks -138.
Practical note: treat spread as control, total as environment, and moneyline as win price. Using all three together reduces misreads.
For a quick scan of the futures market, check the Super Bowl futures odds.
[tallysight url="https://tallysight.com/new/widget/tile/nfl/org:the-lines/entity:los-angeles-rams/variant:2/autopilot:game/deeplinks?id=78112ee2-72e6-4fb4-bccb-2fbe6bb8c2b6"]
Rams @ Seahawks Records and Split View
The season backing comparison favors Seahawks using the season-form record provided. That “edge” is simply the win rate difference shown by the returned records.
The split record rate comparison identifies Seahawks as higher in recent sample here. The simple read is more wins per game in that window, based on the split object returned.
| Team | Season Record | Relevant Split | ATS Split | O/U Split |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rams | 12-5-0 | 5-3-0 | 5-3-0 | 6-2-0 |
| Seahawks | 14-3-0 | 7-1-0 | 5-3-0 | 3-5-0 |
Last 5 Snapshot: Rams @ Seahawks
This panel lists recent results and market splits where those records are available. It stays bounded and does not invent ATS or O/U when the feed is missing them.
The last-five record rate is leading for Seahawks in this response. Use that as the recent-results baseline, then read ATS/O-U only where the table shows real values instead of N/A.
| Team | Last 5 (SU) | Last 5 ATS | Last 5 O/U |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rams | 3-2-0 | N/A | N/A |
| Seahawks | 5-0-0 | N/A | N/A |
Passing Matchup: Matthew Stafford vs Sam Darnold
Seahawks’ passing profile runs through Sam Darnold, while Rams lean on Matthew Stafford. Use the table to compare output and efficiency side-by-side.
Efficiency favors Sam Darnold — the YPA gap is meaningful here (7.88 vs 8.49). That often points to cleaner throws or more explosive completions.
| Team | QB | Pos | Comp/Att | Comp% | Yards | YPA | Pass TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SEA | Sam Darnold | QB | 323/477 | 68.0% | 4048 | 8.49 | 25 |
| LA | Matthew Stafford | QB | 388/597 | 65.0% | 4707 | 7.88 | 46 |
Featured Backs — Kyren Williams vs Zach Charbonnet
For rushing props and script, carry volume is the first read and efficiency is the second read. If one side leads early, late carries can spike quickly and swing the rushing totals.
If you’re judging “who’s running better” from this dataset, it’s Kyren Williams. The YPC edge is the strongest signal on the board.
| Team | RB | Pos | Att | Yards | YPC | Rush TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SEA | Zach Charbonnet | RB | 184 | 730 | 3.97 | 12 |
| LA | Kyren Williams | RB | 259 | 1252 | 4.83 | 10 |
Top Targets: Puka Nacua vs Jaxon Smith-Njigba
Compare targets, receptions, and yards per target to get a practical receiving edge read.
The cleanest separator here is targets, and it leans Puka Nacua. More looks usually means a steadier floor, especially if the game script stays tight.
| Team | Receiver | Pos | Targets | Rec | Catch% | Yards | Y/Tgt | Rec TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SEA | Jaxon Smith-Njigba | WR | 163 | 119 | 73.0% | 1793 | 11.00 | — |
| LA | Puka Nacua | WR | 166 | 129 | 77.7% | 1715 | 10.33 | — |