Washington Wizards @ Utah Jazz Player Props - March 25th 2026

9:00pm

For Wizards at Jazz, the prop angle is less about forcing a narrative and more about tracking the roles you can trust. Wizards and Jazz both come in with recent form worth noting, which matters when rotations tighten and roles stay consistent. Pace can quietly shape the prop board, because extra possessions usually mean extra chances.
These markets usually tell you a lot about how the game will be played. Two markets we keep coming back to are Points + Assists and Points + Rebounds + Assists. For Points + Assists, the players to watch are Jamir Watkins for Wizards and Cody Williams for Jazz. In Points + Rebounds + Assists, start with Bilal Coulibaly on the Wizards side and Cody Williams for Jazz.
In this breakdown, we flag the stats that matter most for this matchup, then pair them with the props so the sweet spot is easier to see. For the full game breakdown, read the full Wizards vs Jazz matchup preview.
Pace and efficiency for WAS at UTA player props
For props, it helps to start with pace and efficiency because those inputs shape opportunity. The notes below sort each stat into five outcomes so you can scan the edge quickly. For the latest lines and totals, visit the NBA odds page.
| Metric | Away Team Wizards | Home Team Jazz | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pace (Poss/Game) | 103.7 | 104.3 | Jazz slight advantage: on this slate, they play a bit faster, making it fair to project extra possessions to nudge prop volume up. |
| PPG (Season) | 112.8 | 117.3 | Jazz slight advantage: in this profile, their scoring baseline runs a bit higher, putting you on track for points outcomes to have a little more cushion. |
| Offensive Rating | 108.1 | 111.5 | Jazz strong advantage: on the season, they are the clearly more efficient offense, putting you on track for possessions to produce higher-quality looks more consistently. |
| Defensive Rating | 118.9 | 119.0 | Even: in the season data, defensive efficiency is close, which tends to mean shot quality to be similar on both ends. |
After you check pace and efficiency, workload is the next filter because fatigue can show up late. The notes below label each workload metric into five outcomes and call out the team with the edge.
| Workload metric | Away Team Wizards | Home Team Jazz | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Games in last 7 days | 3 | 3 | Even: on this slate, game volume is the same in the last seven days, so anticipate energy and rotations to sit in a similar spot. |
| Time zone changes (last 7) | 0 | 0 | Even: in this game, time-zone change totals are similar over the last week, which should leave project routines to be steady for both teams. |
| Miles travelled (last 7) | 411 | 0 | Jazz slight advantage: on this slate, they have travelled fewer miles in the last week, which suggests anticipate travel fatigue to be slightly lower. |
| Days since last game | 3 | 2 | Wizards slight advantage: tonight, they have one more day since the last game, so project recovery to be a bit better, especially late. |
| Back-to-back | No | No | Even: by the numbers, neither team is on a back-to-back, setting up expect rest to be close to normal for both teams. |
| Rest advantage vs opponent | 1 | -1 | Wizards strong advantage: tonight, they hold a clear rest advantage, which suggests anticipate energy to lean their way, especially late. |
| Previous opponent strength | 65.8 | 56.3 | Jazz strong advantage: in this spot, their previous opponent graded noticeably lighter, making it fair to project carryover wear to be meaningfully lower. |
| Travel miles since last game | 1,968 | 0 | Jazz strong advantage: on this slate, they travelled materially less between the last game and this one, which should leave look for travel fatigue to be meaningfully lower. |
New Users – Bet $5 Get $250 If Your Bet Wins!
400% Extra: Deposit $10 Get $50 NBA injury report for WAS at UTA: out, questionable, and impact
This is the latest availability snapshot for Wizards and Jazz. If key minutes are in question, the biggest swing often is not efficiency, it is who gets a steadier role and who sees the ball a few more times. For a broader futures snapshot, see latest NBA Finals odds.
| Squad | Ruled out | Questionable | Impact (MPG • PPG) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wizards | 7 1 out | 1 1 questionable | 131.5 MPG • 76.7 PPG |
| Jazz | 8 1 out | 0 1 questionable | 220.1 MPG • 134.3 PPG |
- Wizards has a bigger minutes hit listed. If it does not change late, the rotation often tightens and top-end minutes look safer.
- Jazz has a meaningful minutes hole listed. If it holds, minutes tend to stack toward the core and usage follows.
Washington Wizards at Utah Jazz Player Assists Props Picks
Frame Player Assists Props with a quick team read that keeps the context tight: assist rate, assists per game, turnovers per game. Washington Wizards sits at 60.3% assist rate, 25 assists per game, 15.3 turnovers per game; Utah Jazz sits at 69.9%, 29.3, 15.1.
One team carries a small edge in creation, and that often matters in who holds the steadier assist floor. If one side is looser with ball security, the other side can get more possessions, and more possessions can lift Player Assists Props when the finishers convert.
| NBA Player | AST/G | Minutes | Usage % | Assist % |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bilal Coulibaly (WAS) | 2.7 | 27 | 19% | 13.8% |
| Bub Carrington (WAS) | 4.5 | 28 | 17.5% | 22.5% |
| Will Riley (WAS) | 1.7 | 20 | 19.3% | 11.9% |
| Jamir Watkins (WAS) | 1.2 | 19 | 14% | 8.4% |
| John Konchar (UTA) | 1.9 | 23 | 9.1% | 10% |
| Ace Bailey (UTA) | 1.8 | 27 | 21% | 9.8% |
| Cody Williams (UTA) | 1.6 | 22 | 14.4% | 9.5% |
- Washington Wizards pick: unibet +112 u5.5. Bub Carrington is at 4.5 versus 5.5, a quick gap of 1. The price makes it worth to look twice, but minutes still decide it.
- Utah Jazz pick: fanduel -136 u2.5. Ace Bailey is at 1.8 versus 2.5, a quick gap of 0.7. The price makes it worth to look twice, but minutes still decide it.
| NBA Player | Prop Bet / Assist Line | Best Bookmaker Odds | Odds |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bilal Coulibaly (WAS) | o2.5 u2.5 | fanduel fanduel | -192 +142 |
| Bub Carrington (WAS) | o5.5 u5.5 | unibet unibet | -150 +112 |
| Will Riley (WAS) | o3.5 u3.5 | caesars caesars | +130 -176 |
| Jamir Watkins (WAS) | o2.5 u2.5 | fanduel fanduel | +104 -138 |
| John Konchar (UTA) | o3.5 u3.5 | caesars caesars | +139 -190 |
| Ace Bailey (UTA) | o2.5 u2.5 | fanduel fanduel | +102 -136 |
| Cody Williams (UTA) | o1.5 u1.5 | fanduel fanduel | +132 -178 |
Wizards vs Jazz NBA Player 3PM Props
Recent 3P% gives the best snapshot of current rhythm, and Utah Jazz is at 35.2 while Washington Wizards is at 38.5. The season 3-point percentage baseline is 0.2 for Utah Jazz and 0.2 for Washington Wizards.
| NBA Player | Minutes | Usage% | 3P% | 3PM line | Proxy 3PM |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bilal Coulibaly (WAS) | 27 | 19 | 31.8 | 0.5 | 1.63 |
| Bub Carrington (WAS) | 28 | 17.5 | 39.2 | 2.5 | 1.92 |
| Will Riley (WAS) | 20 | 19.3 | 33.3 | 1.5 | 1.29 |
| Tristan Vukcevic (WAS) | 14 | 26.7 | 33.3 | 1.5 | 1.24 |
| Jaden Hardy (WAS) | 21 | 25.4 | 42.7 | 3.5 | 2.28 |
| Jamir Watkins (WAS) | 19 | 14 | 29.4 | 0.5 | 0.78 |
| John Konchar (UTA) | 23 | 9.1 | 19.4 | 0.5 | 0.41 |
| Ace Bailey (UTA) | 27 | 21 | 36.2 | 2.5 | 2.05 |
| Cody Williams (UTA) | 22 | 14.4 | 24 | 1.5 | 0.76 |
- WAS pick: Betrivers Under -152 . Bub Carrington (WAS) checks in at a proxy of 1.92 made threes with a line of 2.5. A stat-first says "Under lean", and the price implies the market is not treating that side as the most likely, which is the kind of spot to flag and then sanity-check (minutes/role, matchup, etc.).
- UTA pick: Fanduel Under +108 . Ace Bailey (UTA) lines up with a proxy of 2.05 made threes against a line of 2.5. A stat-first says "Under lean", and the price implies the market is not treating that side as the most likely, which is the kind of spot to flag and then sanity-check (minutes/role, matchup, etc.).
| NBA Player | Prop Bet / 3PM Line | Best Bookmaker Odds | Odds |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bilal Coulibaly (WAS) | o0.5 u0.5 | Fanduel Fanduel | -174 +130 |
| Bub Carrington (WAS) | o2.5 u2.5 | Betrivers Betrivers | +110 -152 |
| Will Riley (WAS) | o1.5 u1.5 | Fanduel Fanduel | -162 +122 |
| Tristan Vukcevic (WAS) | o1.5 u1.5 | Draftkings Draftkings | +114 -150 |
| Jaden Hardy (WAS) | o3.5 u3.5 | Fanduel Fanduel | +144 -194 |
| Jamir Watkins (WAS) | o0.5 u0.5 | Fanduel Fanduel | -168 +126 |
| John Konchar (UTA) | o0.5 u0.5 | Fanduel Fanduel | -154 +116 |
| Ace Bailey (UTA) | o2.5 u2.5 | Fanduel Fanduel | -144 +108 |
| Cody Williams (UTA) | o1.5 u1.5 | Fanatics Fanatics | +200 -357 |
New Customers: Bet $5+ Get $300 in Bonus Bets Instantly Wizards at Jazz NBA Player Points Prop Picks
Checking recent form, Washington Wizards has gone 0-10 with a 0% clip, racking up 114.3 points per game and yielding 130.6. Utah Jazz is 3-7 (30%), scoring 116.4 and allowing 122.7. Those marks are the starting point for points props.
When a team is putting up points and the opponent is allowing plenty , points props usually get loose . Utah Jazz fits that script better entering this one, and it is a clean first stop for points props.
| NBA Player | PTS/G | Minutes | Usage % | TS % |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bilal Coulibaly (WAS) | 11.3 | 27 | 19% | 53.1% |
| Bub Carrington (WAS) | 10.2 | 28 | 17.5% | 54.7% |
| Will Riley (WAS) | 8.9 | 20 | 19.3% | 54.7% |
| Tristan Vukcevic (WAS) | 8.7 | 14 | 26.7% | 59.4% |
| Anthony Gill (WAS) | 4.3 | 14 | 12.1% | 63.5% |
| Jaden Hardy (WAS) | 12.8 | 21 | 25.4% | 58.9% |
| Jamir Watkins (WAS) | 6.3 | 19 | 14% | 54.5% |
| John Konchar (UTA) | 4.3 | 23 | 9.1% | 50.1% |
| Ace Bailey (UTA) | 13.4 | 27 | 21% | 54.5% |
| Cody Williams (UTA) | 7.4 | 22 | 14.4% | 53.8% |
- Washington Wizards cleanest lean in this game : FanDuel Under +108. Anthony Gill is producing 4.3 a night , while the line is 10.5. On a quick data check it reads "Under," and the odds leave a bit of room , so confirm rotation and any late role change.
- Utah Jazz top angle in this game : FanDuel Under -114. Ace Bailey is producing 13.4 a night , while the line is 15.5. On a quick data check it reads "Under," and the odds leave a bit of space , so confirm rotation and any late role change.
| NBA Player | Prop Bet / Points Line | Best Bookmaker | Odds |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bilal Coulibaly (WAS) | o15.5 u15.5 | FanDuel FanDuel | -112 -118 |
| Bub Carrington (WAS) | o14.5 u14.5 | Unibet Unibet | -124 -108 |
| Will Riley (WAS) | o21.5 u21.5 | FanDuel FanDuel | -130 -102 |
| Tristan Vukcevic (WAS) | o12.5 u12.5 | Unibet Unibet | -125 -106 |
| Anthony Gill (WAS) | o10.5 u10.5 | FanDuel FanDuel | -144 +108 |
| Jaden Hardy (WAS) | o14.5 u14.5 | FanDuel FanDuel | -125 -106 |
| Jamir Watkins (WAS) | o8.5 u8.5 | FanDuel FanDuel | -122 -108 |
| John Konchar (UTA) | o7.5 u7.5 | FanDuel FanDuel | -110 -120 |
| Ace Bailey (UTA) | o15.5 u15.5 | FanDuel FanDuel | -114 -114 |
| Cody Williams (UTA) | o16.5 u16.5 | FanDuel FanDuel | -102 -130 |
Wizards at Jazz Points + Assists Prop Picks
Across the recent five games, Washington Wizards land at 0-5, while Utah Jazz land at 1-4.
That lean toward Utah Jazz plays for points plus assists props because better form often connects to steadier scoring and cleaner setup touches.
| NBA Player | PTS/G | AST/G | PTS+AST | Minutes | Usage % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bilal Coulibaly (WAS) | 11.3 | 2.7 | 14 | 27 | 19% |
| Will Riley (WAS) | 8.9 | 1.7 | 10.6 | 20 | 19.3% |
| Tristan Vukcevic (WAS) | 8.7 | 1.1 | 9.8 | 14 | 26.7% |
| Anthony Gill (WAS) | 4.3 | 1 | 5.3 | 14 | 12.1% |
| Jamir Watkins (WAS) | 6.3 | 1.2 | 7.5 | 19 | 14% |
| John Konchar (UTA) | 4.3 | 1.9 | 6.2 | 23 | 9.1% |
| Ace Bailey (UTA) | 13.4 | 1.8 | 15.2 | 27 | 21% |
| Cody Williams (UTA) | 7.4 | 1.6 | 9 | 22 | 14.4% |
- WAS pick: Caesars Under listed at -104 for Jamir Watkins points plus assists. On the stat sheet, Jamir Watkins brings 7.5 points plus assists per game with a line of 11.5, so the straight angle is Under; circle it and double-check minutes, role, and matchup.
- UTA pick: Caesars Under posted at -110 for Cody Williams points plus assists. This clear angle leans Under because 9 and 20.5 are separated by 11.5; highlight it and recheck role, minutes, and matchup fit.
| NBA Player | Prop Bet / Points + Assists Line | Bookmaker | Odds |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bilal Coulibaly (WAS) | o18.5 u18.5 | FanDuel FanDuel | -125 -106 |
| Will Riley (WAS) | o20.5 u20.5 | Caesars Caesars | -114 -118 |
| Tristan Vukcevic (WAS) | o13.5 u13.5 | sportingbet sportingbet | +105 -140 |
| Anthony Gill (WAS) | o9.5 u9.5 | BetMGM BetMGM | -118 -110 |
| Jamir Watkins (WAS) | o11.5 u11.5 | Caesars Caesars | -129 -104 |
| John Konchar (UTA) | o10.5 u10.5 | Caesars Caesars | -107 -125 |
| Ace Bailey (UTA) | o29.5 u29.5 | Caesars Caesars | -112 -120 |
| Cody Williams (UTA) | o20.5 u20.5 | Caesars Caesars | -122 -110 |
Washington Wizards at Utah Jazz NBA Player Rebounds Prop Picks
When the cross check is flat, props come down to who controls the steady boards, and rebounds per game plus the split between offensive rebounds and defensive rebounds points to Utah Jazz as the thin lean.
Each team’s best rebounds prop leans on rebounds per game versus the posted rebounds line, supported by minutes per game plus rebound percentage, and the final pick is the option that reads best when the gap clears 0.5.
| NBA Player | REB/G | Minutes | Usage % | REB% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bilal Coulibaly (WAS) | 4.4 | 27 | 19% | 8.8% |
| Bub Carrington (WAS) | 3.6 | 28 | 17.5% | 6.9% |
| Will Riley (WAS) | 2.6 | 20 | 19.3% | 6.7% |
| Tristan Vukcevic (WAS) | 3 | 14 | 26.7% | 12% |
| Anthony Gill (WAS) | 2.6 | 14 | 12.1% | 9.8% |
| Jamir Watkins (WAS) | 3.6 | 19 | 14% | 9.9% |
| John Konchar (UTA) | 4.2 | 23 | 9.1% | 9.8% |
| Ace Bailey (UTA) | 4.1 | 27 | 21% | 8.2% |
| Cody Williams (UTA) | 2.8 | 22 | 14.4% | 6.8% |
- WAS pick: FanDuel Over +124 . Bilal Coulibaly has a real rebounds baseline at 4.4, and the line at 3.5 leaves a useful cushion.
- UTA pick: FanDuel Under +118 . John Konchar has a consistent rebounds baseline at 4.2, and the line at 9.5 leaves a clear cushion.
| NBA Player | Prop Bet / Rebound Line | Best Bookmaker Odds | Odds |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bilal Coulibaly (WAS) | o3.5 u3.5 | FanDuel FanDuel | +124 -166 |
| Bub Carrington (WAS) | o4.5 u4.5 | unibet unibet | +108 -143 |
| Will Riley (WAS) | o10.5 u10.5 | FanDuel FanDuel | -102 -130 |
| Tristan Vukcevic (WAS) | o4.5 u4.5 | unibet unibet | -159 +120 |
| Anthony Gill (WAS) | o7.5 u7.5 | FanDuel FanDuel | +126 -168 |
| Jamir Watkins (WAS) | o4.5 u4.5 | FanDuel FanDuel | +110 -146 |
| John Konchar (UTA) | o9.5 u9.5 | FanDuel FanDuel | -158 +118 |
| Ace Bailey (UTA) | o6.5 u6.5 | FanDuel FanDuel | +114 -152 |
| Cody Williams (UTA) | o3.5 u3.5 | FanDuel FanDuel | -138 +104 |
Wizards at Jazz Points + Rebounds + Assists Props Picks
Points + rebounds + assists props live in the space between shot-making and shot-denial. If one team owns the offensive rating edge while the other side holds the defensive rating edge, PRA can split into assists from makes and rebounds from misses. The clean check is to see which side is more likely to control the flow. The Utah Jazz field-goal percentage and the Washington Wizards field-goal percentage are worth a snappy check because made shots can power assists while missed shots can fuel rebounds.
Win percentage is not the bet, but it can signal which team keeps its offense organized and which team drifts into broken possessions. The picks use a clean lane by lining up each NBA Player season PRA average against the line, then taking the strongest edge and price for each team, provided the market data is complete.
| NBA Player | PTS/G | REB/G | AST/G | PRA/G | Minutes | Usage % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bilal Coulibaly (WAS) | 11.3 | 4.4 | 2.7 | 18.4 | 27 | 19% |
| Bub Carrington (WAS) | 10.2 | 3.6 | 4.5 | 18.3 | 28 | 17.5% |
| Will Riley (WAS) | 8.9 | 2.6 | 1.7 | 13.2 | 20 | 19.3% |
| Tristan Vukcevic (WAS) | 8.7 | 3 | 1.1 | 12.8 | 14 | 26.7% |
| Anthony Gill (WAS) | 4.3 | 2.6 | 1 | 7.9 | 14 | 12.1% |
| Jaden Hardy (WAS) | 12.8 | 1.8 | 1 | 15.6 | 21 | 25.4% |
| Jamir Watkins (WAS) | 6.3 | 3.6 | 1.2 | 11.1 | 19 | 14% |
| John Konchar (UTA) | 4.3 | 4.2 | 1.9 | 10.4 | 23 | 9.1% |
| Ace Bailey (UTA) | 13.4 | 4.1 | 1.8 | 19.3 | 27 | 21% |
| Cody Williams (UTA) | 7.4 | 2.8 | 1.6 | 11.8 | 22 | 14.4% |
- WAS pick: If the aim is PRA value, the cleanest path is FanDuel Under -108 on Bilal Coulibaly. The average sits at 18.4 and the line is 23.5, so the edge signals up fast, with about 93 profit per $100 stake.
- UTA pick: If the goal is PRA value, the top path is Caesars Under -109 on Cody Williams. The average sits at 11.8 and the line is 27.5, so the edge signals up fast, with about 92 profit per $100 stake.
| NBA Player | Prop Bet (Points + Rebounds + Assists Line) | Bookmaker | Odds |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bilal Coulibaly (WAS) | o23.5 u23.5 | FanDuel FanDuel | -122 -108 |
| Bub Carrington (WAS) | o25.5 u25.5 | sugarhouse sugarhouse | -110 -122 |
| Will Riley (WAS) | o29.5 u29.5 | Caesars Caesars | -118 -113 |
| Tristan Vukcevic (WAS) | o17.5 u17.5 | sportingbet sportingbet | -118 -110 |
| Anthony Gill (WAS) | o14.5 u14.5 | BetMGM BetMGM | -110 -125 |
| Jaden Hardy (WAS) | o18.5 u18.5 | sports-interaction sports-interaction | -120 -110 |
| Jamir Watkins (WAS) | o12.5 u12.5 | FanDuel FanDuel | -122 -108 |
| John Konchar (UTA) | o20.5 u20.5 | Caesars Caesars | -120 -113 |
| Ace Bailey (UTA) | o35.5 u35.5 | Caesars Caesars | -115 -115 |
| Cody Williams (UTA) | o27.5 u27.5 | Caesars Caesars | -122 -109 |
Up To $1500 in Bonus Bets Paid Back if your First Bet Does Not Win Before we get into specific markets, the thread is the same: a faster tempo tempo, and two teams whose rotation decisions matter a lot. Wizards has played at roughly a 0% win clip over its last ten, and Jazz is around 30%.
For Points + Assists, the two players to circle are Jamir Watkins for Wizards and Cody Williams for Jazz. If either team shortens the rotation, this is often the first place it shows.
In Points + Rebounds + Assists, start with Bilal Coulibaly on the Wizards side and Cody Williams for Jazz. If the tempo is steady, you get more chances. If it slows, the best players still find their volume. For the full game breakdown, read the full matchup preview.