Indiana Pacers @ New York Knicks Picks and Predictions - March 17th 2026

7:30pm

The schedule sends Indiana Pacers (19-63) to New York Knicks (53-29) at Madison Square Garden on Tuesday, March 17, 2026. Knicks carry a 13.5-point spread, with 223.5 posted on the total. The core question is simple: can the dog hang around long enough to matter?
The recent trend is cleaner for Knicks, which gives them a more reliable short-term profile. The goal from here is simple: turn the market into a usable betting read by checking the spread, total, key matchup points, injuries, and props, and if you are deciding which sportsbook to use, our best sites for betting on NBA games guide can help you compare the market.
NBA odds and lines for Indiana Pacers at New York Knicks
For Indiana Pacers, the last-five snapshot is compact but telling: last-five ATS: 1-4-0 with another clue in average margin: -60. For a fast read before tip, lean on latest Indiana Pacers odds and keep it updated.
For the home side, the first check is last-five ATS: 1-4-0, then you can layer in a broader view using last-five over-under: 2-3-0. Because numbers often arrive late, keep latest New York Knicks odds open as a steady page for final pricing.
Indiana Pacers at New York Knicks Trends and Momentum: Last 5 Record and Last 10 Scoring Profile
last-five results leans slightly to New York Knicks (3-2) over Indiana Pacers (0-5). over the last 10, the scoring/defense split is not totally listed, so those two rows act as a simple read.
| Metric | Indiana Pacers | New York Knicks |
|---|---|---|
| Last 5 (Form) | ||
| Record (W-L) | 0-5 | 3-2 |
| Win % | 0 | 60 |
| ATS record | 1-4-0 | 1-4-0 |
| Over/Under record | 3-2-0 | 2-3-0 |
| Average margin | -60 | 8 |
| Last 10 (Recent Performance) | ||
| Points per game | 109.6 | 115.4 |
| Points allowed | 125.4 | 104 |
| Margin | -158 | 114 |
| FG % | 44.8 | 48.8 |
| 3PT % | 32.3 | 36.2 |
New Users – Bet $5 Get $200 in Bet Reset Tokens for 5 Days Indiana Pacers at New York Knicks Series History and Last Meeting
Use the last meeting as a clear check: Pacers won 125-108, a 17 margin. The series summary below adds broader context for how often that pattern shows up.
| Item | Value |
|---|---|
| Last meeting score | 125-108 |
| Last meeting winner | Pacers |
| Last meeting margin | 17 |
| Side | Meetings | Wins | Losses | Average margin | Total points | ATS record | Over/Under record |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Away | 4 | 3 | 1 | -6 | 234 | 3-0-0 | 2-1-0 |
| Home | 4 | 1 | 3 | 6 | 234 | 0-3-0 | 2-1-0 |
Indiana Pacers vs New York Knicks Injury Report: Out, Questionable, and Impact
With health uncertainty on both reports, you can see a quicker hook for lineups that stall, and late-game matchups can flip on a single upgrade. I back the team with steady responsibilities, since the cleanest read usually comes from fewer moving parts. For a broader postseason snapshot, see NBA Finals odds guide.
| Metric | Indiana Pacers | New York Knicks |
|---|---|---|
| Players Out | 3 | 0 |
| Players Questionable | 0 | 0 |
| Injured Minutes Per Game | 42 | 0 |
| Injured Points Per Game | 16.7 | 0 |
Indiana Pacers at New York Knicks Key Players by Usage%: Top 3 Per Team
The top usage workload in this matchup sits with Jalen Brunson (New York Knicks), and the table below links that to production and efficiency. Their brief profile: Min 35, Usage% 30.6, 26 PPG, 3.3 RPG, 6.8 APG, TS% 58, eFG% 53.3, +/- 4.8, and TO/G 2.4.
Indiana Pacers’s top three are Pascal Siakam (30.3), Andrew Nembhard (23.7), and Bennedict Mathurin (23.3), and New York Knicks’s top three are Jalen Brunson (30.6), Karl-Anthony Towns (26.1), and Jordan Clarkson (21.3), and this readout shows how creation is distributed. A more tight top line usually means heavier on-ball responsibility for the primary option, while a flat top three can signal more shared creation and easier rotation coverage if one piece is limited.
For a quick check at the award market, see the current MVP board. Start with our NBA MVP odds today and scan the names.
| Team | Player | Min | Usage% | PPG | RPG | APG | TS% | eFG% | +/- | TO/G |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Indiana Pacers | Pascal Siakam | 33 | 30.3 | 24 | 6.6 | 3.8 | 56.2 | 52.9 | -3.7 | 2.2 |
| Indiana Pacers | Andrew Nembhard | 31 | 23.7 | 16.9 | 2.8 | 7.7 | 56.4 | 51.3 | -6.9 | 2.4 |
| Indiana Pacers | Bennedict Mathurin | 32 | 23.3 | 17.8 | 5.4 | 2.3 | 58.9 | 51.4 | -7.6 | 2.3 |
| New York Knicks | Jalen Brunson | 35 | 30.6 | 26 | 3.3 | 6.8 | 58 | 53.3 | 4.8 | 2.4 |
| New York Knicks | Karl-Anthony Towns | 31 | 26.1 | 20.1 | 11.9 | 3 | 61.9 | 55.6 | 5 | 2.5 |
| New York Knicks | Jordan Clarkson | 18 | 21.3 | 8.6 | 1.8 | 1.3 | 54.8 | 51.7 | 1.5 | 0.9 |
Indiana Pacers vs New York Knicks Advanced Betting Trends: ATS and Totals
Indiana Pacers is at 40% ATS and New York Knicks is at 50%. On totals, Over % sits at 50% for Indiana Pacers and 50% for New York Knicks. If the pace spikes, the higher Over % side is better suited to keep the scoreboard moving.
| Metric | Indiana Pacers | New York Knicks |
|---|---|---|
| ATS W-L-P | 29-39-0 | 35-32-2 |
| ATS Win % | 40% | 50% |
| Home ATS Wins | 18 | 21 |
| Away ATS Wins | 11 | 14 |
| ATS as Favorite | 3-6-0 | 28-26-2 |
| ATS as Underdog | 26-33-0 | 7-6-0 |
| Over Wins | 33 | 32 |
| Under Wins | 35 | 37 |
| Over % | 50% | 50% |
New DraftKings Customers: Spend $5+ Get $200 in Bonuses Instantly!
Spend $10 Get 200 in Bonus Picks Indiana Pacers vs New York Knicks Prediction and Betting Outlook
- Game script (pace): If Indiana Pacers is able to push tempo, New York Knicks wants to slow the game and make every trip a decision. That early tempo tell often tracks what the total turns into.
- Efficiency edge (side): The baseline numbers leans toward New York Knicks if it keeps the possession math cleaner and avoids giveaways. A handful of extra looks can swing the side.
- Late filters (availability + market): Make the final pass on who is in and how the spot sets up, since role changes can change the late-game script quickly. Market movement is a prompt to double-check the matchup assumptions rather than forcing a narrative.