Dallas Mavericks @ Indiana Pacers Picks and Predictions - February 22nd 2026

5:00pm

On Sunday, February 22, 2026 at 10:00 PM ET, Dallas Mavericks (26-56) make the trip to at Gainbridge Fieldhouse to match up with Indiana Pacers (19-63). The number starts with Mavericks laying 1 and the total at 235.5. This number leaves little room for sloppy possessions late.
Recent form is part of the handicap here: Pacers are 2-3, and Mavericks are 0-5. The rest of this preview breaks down the spread, total, matchup details, injuries, and props so the betting angle stays tied to the likely game script, and if you are comparing books before locking anything in, our best NBA betting sites guide can help you compare the market.
Dallas Mavericks at Indiana Pacers odds and lines
Dallas Mavericks enters this spot with a clean read on form: last-five ATS: 1-4-0, plus supporting context in average margin: -65. If you want a timely market check, the away hub at Dallas Mavericks betting odds is a solid place to start.
Home form often reads cleaner than the noise, and for Indiana Pacers the key markers are last-five over-under: 4-1-0 with a useful add-on in last-five ATS: 2-3-0. If you are checking the home side close to tip, Indiana Pacers betting odds is the best spot to keep the board current.
Mavericks at Pacers Series History and Last Meeting
The most recent meeting is a clear guide: Pacers claimed 137-120, with a 17 margin. The series table below ties that result to the wider head-to-head record.
| Item | Value |
|---|---|
| Last meeting score | 137-120 |
| Last meeting winner | Pacers |
| Last meeting margin | 17 |
| Side | Meetings | Wins | Losses | Average margin | Total points | ATS record | Over/Under record |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Away | 2 | 1 | 1 | 4.4 | 252 | 0-1-0 | 0-1-0 |
| Home | 2 | 1 | 1 | -4.4 | 252 | 1-0-0 | 0-1-0 |
New Users – Bet $5 Get $200 in Bet Reset Tokens for 5 Days Dallas Mavericks at Indiana Pacers Situational Analysis (Rest, Travel, Schedule)
The days-since numbers are even (2 vs 2), so the spot tilts on travel and weekly workload shape. The previous-opponent line points to a tougher test for Dallas Mavericks (61.4 vs 29.1), and that can lift the standard for carryover.
The games-in-7 line is level at 0 vs 0, so it is not the strongest factor alone. With more immediate movement (511.4 vs 491.6), Dallas Mavericks carries a drag that can surface in early spacing and late pace. The last-7 miles row is even at 0 vs 0, which keeps the weekly travel picture fairly even.
| Metric | Dallas Mavericks | Indiana Pacers |
|---|---|---|
| Days since last game | 2 | 2 |
| Rest advantage vs opponent | 0 | 0 |
| Travel miles since last game | 511.4 | 491.6 |
| Games in last 7 days | 0 | 0 |
| Time zone changes | 0 | 0 |
| Miles travelled last 7 days | 0 | 0 |
| Schedule strength | 42 | 38.3 |
| Remaining schedule strength | — | — |
| Previous opponent strength (win %) | 61.4 | 29.1 |
| Next opponent strength (win %) | 26.3 | 34.5 |
Season Profile Comparison: Dallas Mavericks vs Indiana Pacers
These tables are grouped to make the season profile easier to scan. Each category is anchored to two key stats, since that’s usually where you can tell which side has the cleaner path if the game follows form.
Record & Scoring
The two drivers split—Indiana Pacers on win% (26.8), Dallas Mavericks on margin (-5.5). If this turns into a one-run game late, margin can matter because it often correlates with avoiding the kind of three-minute droughts that decide close finishes.
| Metric | Dallas Mavericks | Indiana Pacers |
|---|---|---|
| Record (W-L) | 26-56 | 19-63 |
| Win Percentage | 25 | 26.8 |
| Points For | 114.1 | 112.4 |
| Points Against | 119.6 | 120.4 |
| Points Margin | -5.5 | -8 |
Efficiency
Indiana Pacers leads the two efficiency drivers—shooting efficiency (110.9 vs 107.3) and field goal efficiency (53.3 vs 52.7). If that shows up, Indiana Pacers can build separation without needing a big possession advantage.
| Metric | Dallas Mavericks | Indiana Pacers |
|---|---|---|
| Field Goal % | 0.7 | 0.7 |
| Three-Point % | 0.2 | 0.2 |
| Shooting Efficiency | 107.3 | 110.9 |
| Field Goal Efficiency | 52.7 | 53.3 |
| Free Throw Rate | 0.3 | 0.3 |
| Three-Point Rate | 0.4 | 0.4 |
| Free Throw % | 0.8 | 0.8 |
Tempo, Ratings & Turnovers
The drivers split: Dallas Mavericks leads net rating (-5.4 vs -7.3), but Indiana Pacers has the cleaner turnover number (13.8 vs 14). If Indiana Pacers keeps protecting the ball, they can hang around even against a better overall rating profile.
| Metric | Dallas Mavericks | Indiana Pacers |
|---|---|---|
| Pace | 104.2 | 103.4 |
| Net Rating | -5.4 | -7.3 |
| Offensive Rating | 108.5 | 108.5 |
| Defensive Rating | 113.9 | 115.7 |
| Turnovers Per Game | 14 | 13.8 |
Rebounding, Ball Movement & Disruption
This section is level on the drivers (0.2 vs 0.2, 7.5 vs 7.4), so ball security and box-outs matter more than raw volume. If the game is tight late, one extra second chance or one extra steal is usually the separator.
| Metric | Dallas Mavericks | Indiana Pacers |
|---|---|---|
| Rebounds Per Game | 44.7 | 41.9 |
| Offensive Rebounds | 0.2 | 0.2 |
| Defensive Rebounds | 0.7 | 0.7 |
| Assists Per Game | 25.3 | 27.7 |
| Assist Rate | 60.4 | 67.8 |
| Steals Per Game | 7.5 | 7.4 |
| Blocks Per Game | 5.2 | 4.6 |
For a quick check, head to NBA matchup odds and compare updated prices. A clean refresh can show which games are changing most.
DAL at IND ATS and Over Under Trends
ATS win% reads Dallas Mavericks at 40% and Indiana Pacers at 50%. Over % comes in at Dallas Mavericks 50% and Indiana Pacers 40%. If this game tightens late, the better ATS rate is the one more likely to travel with the margin.
| Metric | Dallas Mavericks | Indiana Pacers |
|---|---|---|
| ATS W-L-P | 24-31-0 | 28-29-0 |
| ATS Win % | 40% | 50% |
| Home ATS Wins | 16 | 17 |
| Away ATS Wins | 8 | 11 |
| ATS as Favorite | 5-11-0 | 3-6-0 |
| ATS as Underdog | 19-20-0 | 25-23-0 |
| Over Wins | 25 | 25 |
| Under Wins | 30 | 32 |
| Over % | 50% | 40% |
DAL at IND Key Players by Usage%: Top 3 Per Team
The leading usage option here is Pascal Siakam (Indiana Pacers), and the table below connects that role to production and efficiency. Their quick snapshot: Min 33, Usage% 30.3, 24 PPG, 6.6 RPG, 3.8 APG, TS% 56.2, eFG% 52.9, +/- -3.7, and TO/G 2.2.
Dallas Mavericks relies on Cooper Flagg (27), D'Angelo Russell (26.1), and Brandon Williams (25.2), while Indiana Pacers relies on Pascal Siakam (30.3), Andrew Nembhard (23.7), and Bennedict Mathurin (23.3), and this breakdown shows the highest-touch options. A more tight top line usually means heavier on-ball responsibility for the primary option, while a flat top three can signal more shared creation and easier rotation coverage if one piece is limited.
For a brief check at the award market, see the current MVP board. Start with our NBA MVP futures market and sort the names.
| Team | Player | Min | Usage% | PPG | RPG | APG | TS% | eFG% | +/- | TO/G |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dallas Mavericks | Cooper Flagg | 33 | 27 | 21 | 6.7 | 4.5 | 54.8 | 49.8 | -3.8 | 2.3 |
| Dallas Mavericks | D'Angelo Russell | 19 | 26.1 | 10.2 | 2.3 | 4 | 51.1 | 47.6 | -1.6 | 1.9 |
| Dallas Mavericks | Brandon Williams | 22 | 25.2 | 13 | 2.9 | 3.9 | 57.2 | 50.1 | -2.2 | 1.9 |
| Indiana Pacers | Pascal Siakam | 33 | 30.3 | 24 | 6.6 | 3.8 | 56.2 | 52.9 | -3.7 | 2.2 |
| Indiana Pacers | Andrew Nembhard | 31 | 23.7 | 16.9 | 2.8 | 7.7 | 56.4 | 51.3 | -6.9 | 2.4 |
| Indiana Pacers | Bennedict Mathurin | 32 | 23.3 | 17.8 | 5.4 | 2.3 | 58.9 | 51.4 | -7.6 | 2.3 |
New DraftKings Customers: Spend $5+ Get $200 in Bonuses Instantly!
Spend $10 Get 200 in Bonus Picks DAL at IND Picks and Betting Outlook
- Game script (pace): Dallas Mavericks can try to push the pace, but Indiana Pacers is more comfortable if it can slow trips into half-court reads. The early rhythm signal usually tracks the total direction.
- Efficiency edge (side): Over the larger sample, it leans to Dallas Mavericks when possessions remain cleaner and the glass is controlled. Those extra chances can swing the margin.
- Late filters (availability + market): Availability and schedule context are the final filter, and they can change who handles closing possessions and what shots show up late. If the market moves, take it as a prompt to confirm the inputs instead of forcing the first read.