New Orleans Pelicans @ Charlotte Hornets Picks and Predictions - February 2nd 2026

3:00pm

New Orleans Pelicans (26-56) head into this road spot against Charlotte Hornets (44-38) at Spectrum Center on Monday, February 2, 2026. On the board, Hornets give 6.5, and the total sits at 230.5. This one comes down to which team can create the cleaner possessions.
There is a real pace contrast here, with Hornets at 99.9 and Pelicans at 103.2, and that can swing the total. The goal from here is simple: turn the market into a usable betting read by checking the spread, total, key matchup points, injuries, and props, and if you are deciding which sportsbook to use, our top sportsbooks for NBA odds guide can help you compare the market.
New Orleans Pelicans at Charlotte Hornets odds and lines
On the road, New Orleans Pelicans shows a useful home-tilting profile built from last-five ATS: 4-1-0 and steady notes like average margin: 4. To stay aligned with late updates, use New Orleans Pelicans odds as a quick reference point.
Back at home, Charlotte Hornets brings a different angle than the road data, starting with last-five over-under: 2-3-0 and a second line in last-five ATS: 3-2-0. For a direct link into the home market view, head to Charlotte Hornets odds and stay ready for late updates.
NOP at CHA Trends and Momentum: Last 5 Form and Last 10 Performance
the last-five form favors Charlotte Hornets with a simple line of 5-0 versus New Orleans Pelicans at 3-2. over the last 10, the ppg and points-allowed lines are not cleanly present, so they stay a quick reference.
| Metric | New Orleans Pelicans | Charlotte Hornets |
|---|---|---|
| Last 5 (Form) | ||
| Record (W-L) | 3-2 | 5-0 |
| Win % | 60 | 100 |
| ATS record | 4-1-0 | 3-2-0 |
| Over/Under record | 2-3-0 | 2-3-0 |
| Average margin | 4 | 63 |
| Last 10 (Recent Performance) | ||
| Points per game | 112.5 | 116.7 |
| Points allowed | 114.9 | 106.3 |
| Margin | -24 | 104 |
| FG % | 44.3 | 48.4 |
| 3PT % | 32.4 | 38.3 |
New Users – Bet $5 Get $200 in Bet Reset Tokens for 5 Days Season Profile Comparison: New Orleans Pelicans vs Charlotte Hornets
This is a season snapshot, organized into four categories so you can see the main levers quickly. In close matchups, the deciding swing often shows up where one team wins both of the key stats in a section.
Record & Scoring
Charlotte Hornets owns the two drivers in this section: win% (51.2) and point margin (4.8). If New Orleans Pelicans wants to erase that profile, it often comes down to one big scoring swing—threes, free throws, or a burst of transition points.
| Metric | New Orleans Pelicans | Charlotte Hornets |
|---|---|---|
| Record (W-L) | 26-56 | 44-38 |
| Win Percentage | 22 | 51.2 |
| Points For | 115.5 | 116 |
| Points Against | 120 | 111.2 |
| Points Margin | -4.5 | 4.8 |
Efficiency
With shooting efficiency (114.9) and field goal efficiency (55.2) both leaning to Charlotte Hornets, the shot-making baseline sits on their side. The swing for New Orleans Pelicans is forcing tougher attempts and turning good possessions into misses.
| Metric | New Orleans Pelicans | Charlotte Hornets |
|---|---|---|
| Field Goal % | 0.7 | 0.7 |
| Three-Point % | 0.2 | 0.3 |
| Shooting Efficiency | 108.1 | 114.9 |
| Field Goal Efficiency | 52.7 | 55.2 |
| Free Throw Rate | 0.3 | 0.2 |
| Three-Point Rate | 0.4 | 0.5 |
| Free Throw % | 0.8 | 0.8 |
Tempo, Ratings & Turnovers
Charlotte Hornets leads net rating (2.9), yet New Orleans Pelicans leads turnovers (13.5), which often decides whether a game stays stable or gets run-heavy. If New Orleans Pelicans is the team getting the first clean shot more often, the rating edge has less room to show.
| Metric | New Orleans Pelicans | Charlotte Hornets |
|---|---|---|
| Pace | 103.2 | 99.9 |
| Net Rating | -4.2 | 2.9 |
| Offensive Rating | 111.4 | 114.7 |
| Defensive Rating | 115.5 | 111.9 |
| Turnovers Per Game | 13.5 | 14.4 |
Rebounding, Ball Movement & Disruption
This section is level on the drivers (0.3 vs 0.3, 8.9 vs 7), so ball security and box-outs matter more than raw volume. If the game is tight late, one extra second chance or one extra steal is usually the separator.
| Metric | New Orleans Pelicans | Charlotte Hornets |
|---|---|---|
| Rebounds Per Game | 43.9 | 46.1 |
| Offensive Rebounds | 0.3 | 0.3 |
| Defensive Rebounds | 0.7 | 0.8 |
| Assists Per Game | 25.1 | 26.3 |
| Assist Rate | 59.6 | 64.3 |
| Steals Per Game | 8.9 | 7 |
| Blocks Per Game | 5.2 | 4.5 |
For a quick check, use NBA game lines to compare the latest numbers. A simple refresh can flag which markets are moving fastest.
NOP at CHA Key Players by Usage%: Top 3 Per Team
The primary usage burden in this matchup lands on Coby White (Charlotte Hornets), and the table below links that to the production and efficiency read. Their brief snapshot: Min 19, Usage% 32.4, 15.6 PPG, 3 RPG, 3 APG, TS% 61.1, eFG% 55.4, +/- 4.6, and TO/G 1.9.
New Orleans Pelicans lists Dejounte Murray (26.8), Zion Williamson (25.9), and Jeremiah Fears (25.6), and Charlotte Hornets lists Coby White (32.4), LaMelo Ball (32.3), and Brandon Miller (28.3), and this readout shows the touch hierarchy. A more tight top line usually means heavier on-ball responsibility for the primary option, while a flat top three can signal more shared creation and easier rotation coverage if one piece is limited.
For a quick look at the award market, visit the current MVP board. Start with our NBA MVP award odds and compare the names.
| Team | Player | Min | Usage% | PPG | RPG | APG | TS% | eFG% | +/- | TO/G |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| New Orleans Pelicans | Dejounte Murray | 28 | 26.8 | 16.7 | 5.4 | 6.4 | 58 | 53.6 | 1.4 | 3.4 |
| New Orleans Pelicans | Zion Williamson | 30 | 25.9 | 21 | 5.7 | 3.2 | 64.4 | 60 | -1.3 | 2 |
| New Orleans Pelicans | Jeremiah Fears | 26 | 25.6 | 14.3 | 3.7 | 3.4 | 52.5 | 48.5 | -3.5 | 2.2 |
| Charlotte Hornets | Coby White | 19 | 32.4 | 15.6 | 3 | 3 | 61.1 | 55.4 | 4.6 | 1.9 |
| Charlotte Hornets | LaMelo Ball | 28 | 32.3 | 20.1 | 4.8 | 7.1 | 54.6 | 51.6 | 5.8 | 2.8 |
| Charlotte Hornets | Brandon Miller | 30 | 28.3 | 20.2 | 4.9 | 3.3 | 57.4 | 53.3 | 5.7 | 2.5 |
NOP at CHA Quarter Scoring Splits
The quarter-by-quarter table show pinpoint scoring patterns without guessing; market context is on today’s NBA odds. New Orleans Pelicans gets a clean glance here: best quarter is 1Q & 4Q, and its stronger half is the first half. Charlotte Hornets follows with a extra look: peaks in 1Q with the edge in the first half.
| Segment | Away | Home |
|---|---|---|
| 1Q Points | 28.6 | 30.5 |
| 2Q Points | 28.4 | 28.6 |
| 3Q Points | 28 | 29.7 |
| 4Q Points | 28.6 | 26.9 |
| 1H Points | 57 | 59.1 |
| 2H Points | 56.6 | 56.6 |
NOP at CHA Injury Report and Availability
If status questions linger for both teams, the bench can get a bigger say, and the final possessions can feature whoever has the cleanest legs. I trust the team with firm assignments, since uncertainty tends to punish teams that already juggle too many roles. For a broader postseason snapshot, see NBA Finals betting odds.
| Metric | New Orleans Pelicans | Charlotte Hornets |
|---|---|---|
| Players Out | 0 | 1 |
| Players Questionable | 0 | 0 |
| Injured Minutes Per Game | 0 | 15.6 |
| Injured Points Per Game | 0 | 6.1 |
New DraftKings Customers: Spend $5+ Get $200 in Bonuses Instantly!
Spend $10 Get 200 in Bonus Picks NOP at CHA Picks and Betting Outlook
- Game script (pace): New Orleans Pelicans is more likely to push tempo, while Charlotte Hornets benefits if it can slow the game into longer half-court possessions. That early pace clue often tracks how the total behaves.
- Efficiency edge (side): The season-long profile leans toward Charlotte Hornets if the possession game stays cleaner on both ends. A few extra trips can swing a tight side read. New Orleans Pelicans has the clearest turnover edge to protect.
- Late filters (availability + market): Treat lineup availability and spot context as the final check, because tightened roles can change both the scoring environment and who closes. If the market has moved, use it as a prompt to re-verify news and matchup assumptions rather than forcing a pregame lean.